From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-90714-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4840 invoked by alias); 5 May 2012 07:13:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 4828 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2012 07:13:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2012 07:13:15 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q457DBjO002832	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Sat, 5 May 2012 03:13:11 -0400
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q457D6sP022652	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Sat, 5 May 2012 03:13:09 -0400
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 07:13:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,        Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>,        ratmice@gmail.com, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Subject: Re: FAILing new testcase for -fdebug-types-section [Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included)]
Message-ID: <20120505071306.GA9206@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <87ehrcco7v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAGyQ6gw=x97Sf9QjtwzrcvVEOC=kuM455cNe-gviqFiQRvBKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22ROUF!A4ZAZQ6RphELbdHDWCV0wsuYB+BKA27__dLppokQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gz=vicpuhGZCT7ZNb2rmR54FFJsMFifV8bFdgG22PoxKw@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22T=3rC9HYgePfzA5MRQ2GNLB16tEMGGmAVKmVXWOyZ2YA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gyCfRBpyV0EVcaD96pGy23yqCjEda-0U2J1Pad07hjgqw@mail.gmail.com> <20120504180458.GA32257@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CAGyQ6gzfzQniMde9Vaof9h5Bw764k0NUzPo5yx+uw82wt0LZcA@mail.gmail.com> <20120505070432.GA8744@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CAGyQ6gyhMdUrH+Jt954ZXXW1QxLanUybGQN680J9XsZchW3c9Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gyhMdUrH+Jt954ZXXW1QxLanUybGQN680J9XsZchW3c9Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2

On Sat, 05 May 2012 09:10:44 +0200, Siva Chandra wrote:
> If you feel there
> is no urgency in eliminating the failure you are seeing, I will dig a
> little more into this and start a discussion in a few days.

A patch should go in only if it is understood why.


Thanks,
Jan