From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 355 invoked by alias); 5 May 2012 07:05:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 334 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2012 07:05:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2012 07:04:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4574cac026428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 5 May 2012 03:04:38 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4574XZZ017655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 5 May 2012 03:04:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 07:05:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Siva Chandra Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey , Eli Zaretskii , Phil Muldoon , ratmice@gmail.com, Doug Evans Subject: Re: FAILing new testcase for -fdebug-types-section [Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included)] Message-ID: <20120505070432.GA8744@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F95630D.1000202@redhat.com> <83vckqfpzb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehrcco7v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120504180458.GA32257@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Sat, 05 May 2012 09:01:36 +0200, Siva Chandra wrote: > I think the attached patch should eliminate this failure. Can you > also test on your side to eliminate GCC version differences (I do not > think it matters, but I want to double check)? All that I did is to > remove 'simple_struct' and its test, and add a static function and a > test for it. Isn't it just hiding some real DWARF GCC or GDB bug? I do not say your code is wrong, your patch may have just discovered a bug elsewhere but I did not have time to investigate it more so I though you may provide the explanation where the real bug is. Thanks, Jan