From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32000 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2012 02:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31982 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2012 02:05:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:05:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3U259eL004737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:05:09 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3U255vp015307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:05:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:07:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com, ccoutant@google.com, saugustine@google.com Subject: Re: Crash regression for gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance.exp [Re: [RFA 3/3] Initial Fission support, the actual Fission stuff] Message-ID: <20120430020504.GA4287@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120418185738.277DB2461AF@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120429085754.GA9548@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01072.txt.bz2 On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:21:18 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > I can't recreate this on my fc16 box (neither i386 nor amd64), FYI in fact the regression was on CentOS-6 (and not real RHEL-6). > Can you test this patch? Regression tested here. Yes, it fixes the regression for me. Thanks, Jan > 2012-04-29 Doug Evans FYI