From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12257 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2012 15:57:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 12190 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Apr 2012 15:57:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:56:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B691D1C6961; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Vs8zgYOgwJ9s; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629A31C61A5; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA04C145616; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ARI troubles Message-ID: <20120425155629.GI10958@adacore.com> References: <4f972bf9.44d8b60a.1aeb.73dcSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4F97308D.2030906@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F97308D.2030906@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00868.txt.bz2 > > My problem here is that the same gdb_ari.sh script > > is used both for trunk as well as fixes branch... > > > > How should I cope with such changes? > > > The script should really be imported to the gdb tree, and > then trunk and branches would have their own versions/revisions > of the script. Agreed. Let's move the script over to the GDB sources, and then we can document Pierre the official maintainer of that script. > The web bits of the ARI would then be adjusted to invoke the script > found in the gdb sources being tested. That should be relatively easy to do, and we can keep two copies around for a day or two while we make the transition... -- Joel