From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1134 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 23:39:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 1020 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 23:39:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:39:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0CC1C6701; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KN84lIoaMIMy; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE1C1C66E5; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5D62145616; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 00:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jeff Kenton Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for Tilera TILE-Gx processor (part 1/2: gdb) Message-ID: <20120420233914.GL2852@adacore.com> References: <4F906647.8090303@tilera.com> <20120420124306.GJ2852@adacore.com> <4F916958.2000507@tilera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F916958.2000507@tilera.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2 > Thanks Joel. I will re-organize the submission as you and Yao > suggest and re-submit it today. (Or I could just put everything in > one submission; the gdbserver stuff is only 150 lines total.) It'll be better for you if you keep them separate, I think. That's because there is a chance that I'll be able to review your GDB changes, but I do not feel competent to review the gdbserver changes. As it happens, I think that our resident GDBserver experts are plenty good enough to review the GDB part as well, but by keeping the bits together, I think you reduce the odds of a prompt review... > The copyright assignment is already under control from a previous > submission by Tilera. See the following: Awesome. It's always a little fustrating to have a change being held up just because of some paperwork. -- Joel