From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Handle sparc compare-and-branch
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420.203408.165318333491237734.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
SPARC-T4 adds a "compare and branch" instruction which fuses
a compare and a branch instruction into one. The branch
is non-delayed, there are no anulling facilities, and the
displacement is 10-bits.
This also corrects the existing bit test for Branch on
Integer Register. The distinguising characteristic between
Branch on Integer Register and Compare-and-Branch is bit
28. The existing code was checking bit 24 for zero, but
that's pointless because bit 24 is already covered by
the "X_OP2 (insn) == 3" test.
Ok to commit?
gdb/
* sparc-tdep.c (X_DISP10): Define.
(sparc_analyze_control_transfer): Handle compare-and-branch.
diff --git a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
index 24d54b7..00bca01 100644
--- a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct regset;
/* Sign extension macros. */
#define X_DISP22(i) ((X_IMM22 (i) ^ 0x200000) - 0x200000)
#define X_DISP19(i) ((((i) & 0x7ffff) ^ 0x40000) - 0x40000)
+#define X_DISP10(i) ((((((i) >> 11) && 0x300) | (((i) >> 5) & 0xff)) ^ 0x200) - 0x200)
#define X_SIMM13(i) ((((i) & 0x1fff) ^ 0x1000) - 0x1000)
/* Fetch the instruction at PC. Instructions are always big-endian
@@ -1451,14 +1452,24 @@ sparc_analyze_control_transfer (struct frame_info *frame,
{
unsigned long insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
int conditional_p = X_COND (insn) & 0x7;
- int branch_p = 0;
+ int branch_p = 0, fused_p = 0;
long offset = 0; /* Must be signed for sign-extend. */
- if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 3 && (insn & 0x1000000) == 0)
+ if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 3)
{
- /* Branch on Integer Register with Prediction (BPr). */
- branch_p = 1;
- conditional_p = 1;
+ if ((insn & 0x10000000) == 0)
+ {
+ /* Branch on Integer Register with Prediction (BPr). */
+ branch_p = 1;
+ conditional_p = 1;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Compare and Branch */
+ branch_p = 1;
+ fused_p = 1;
+ offset = 4 * X_DISP10 (insn);
+ }
}
else if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 6)
{
@@ -1495,7 +1506,16 @@ sparc_analyze_control_transfer (struct frame_info *frame,
if (branch_p)
{
- if (conditional_p)
+ if (fused_p)
+ {
+ /* Fused compare-and-branch instructions are non-delayed,
+ and do not have an annuling capability. So we need to
+ always set a breakpoint on both the NPC and the branch
+ target address. */
+ gdb_assert (offset != 0);
+ return pc + offset;
+ }
+ else if (conditional_p)
{
/* For conditional branches, return nPC + 4 iff the annul
bit is 1. */
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-21 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-21 2:22 David Miller [this message]
2012-04-21 17:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-04-21 22:29 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420.203408.165318333491237734.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox