Re: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST

Doug Evans
2012-05-20T20:28:41Z

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:42:56 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
>> Since it's now ok to use int64_t,uint64_t (right?) I wonder if we
>> should move away from LONGEST,ULONGEST.
>> [I remember a port Cygnus once did where long long was 128 bits.  1/2 :-)]
>
> I agree.  Although if for example Siddhesh has the patch already mostly ready
> with LONGEST/ULONGEST I do not think it needs to be reworked, do you?

Naw, I'm not suggesting it has to be reworked.
Now seemed like a good time to raise the issue, that's all.