From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18261 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 23:26:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 18253 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 23:26:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:26:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441591C675F; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IZDYL10Kh3pb; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0E01C674D; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:25:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E7D0145616; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix in-src-tree builds by making gdbserver/gnulib/ a separate library (a la libiberty, etc.), and adding ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR. Message-ID: <20120417232552.GS2852@adacore.com> References: <1334127046-27627-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <20120413212559.GA5867@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F88F188.1050401@codesourcery.com> <20120415164917.GA2861@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8BFB25.5030808@redhat.com> <4F8C5794.5050302@redhat.com> <20120416174339.GA11991@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D9F1E.2070203@redhat.com> <20120417170521.GA9906@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8DA538.1060000@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F8DA538.1060000@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2 > Okay, then here's the current list, adding "gnulib-wrap", for > being shorter than "wrapper", while meaning basically the same. > > gnulib-wrap/gnulib/ > gnulib-wrapper/gnulib/ > gnulib-pkg/gnulib/ > > I'm torn now between gnulib-wrap and gnulib-pkg, pending > more towards wrap. I think I'll go with that if I don't hear other > preferences, but any of those is fine with me. Anyone? gnulib-glue? (hmm, not great, as it's more than glue, but we can twist the meaning of glue to include the import) gnulib-import? (to me, the extra characters are not an issue) Personally, my preference is gnulib/gnulib, and I remember seeing plenty of packages follow that pattern, so I don't feel that there is anything wrong with this. But on the other hand, it's not very important, so whatever gets decided is fine by me (even gnulib-wrap, which unfortunately is my least favorite :-P). -- Joel