From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20317 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 15:23:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 20308 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 15:23:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:23:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HFNLvR024898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:23:21 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3HFNHVR029787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:23:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:32:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Support 64-bit constants/enums on 32-bit host [Re: [PATCH] Allow 64-bit enum values] Message-ID: <20120417152316.GA27888@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <87d397syts.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120229135148.GA32128@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120301224428.GA30631@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120305063542.GA30196@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120305080512.GA12311@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120321100630.GA14496@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120417130833.GB15356@host2.jankratochvil.net> <878vhuwhrd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120417145208.GA26552@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87vckyv15c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vckyv15c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:17:03 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > The completion thing is an interesting idea. > It does seem pointless to expand symtabs in this case. > I wonder if there is a rationale. The completion works also for C++ function parameters. For the parameters you already need the symtabs expanded, to even just display them. But sure in practice (a) One completes on the function name part, not completing the parameters, so in fact one does not need the expansion. (b) If there are more than a handful options user sees just the first screen and presses rather "q to quit", so collecting parameters from all the functions is also pointless. Regards, Jan