From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12894 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 15:11:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 12877 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 15:11:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:11:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05651C6B54; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:11:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tzEzf506b9-W; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:11:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092A81C67C0; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:11:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A58DA145616; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix in-src-tree builds by making gdbserver/gnulib/ a separate library (a la libiberty, etc.), and adding ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR. Message-ID: <20120417151120.GM2852@adacore.com> References: <4F88F188.1050401@codesourcery.com> <20120415164917.GA2861@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8BFB25.5030808@redhat.com> <4F8C5794.5050302@redhat.com> <87vckzzbss.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8C82A6.5000104@redhat.com> <20120416211912.GJ2852@adacore.com> <4F8CA3DB.3090005@earthlink.net> <87sjg2wopr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sjg2wopr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 > Stan> It *is* beneficial to get BFD checkins automatically. However, I > Stan> think we'd be OK with a daily pull from a binutils repo, it's not > Stan> often that a GDB change is revlocked to a BFD version. (And of course > Stan> by "BFD" I also mean opcodes etc as well :-) ) > > I think Joseph Myers' migration plan is still the gold standard. > > In that one we would keep gdb and binutils in the same repository, > recognizing that the projects share a lot of code. Right - that's what I was trying to imply. My question regarding synchronization really refers to the toplevel directory. Maybe gdb+binutils could have their own src, allowing us to simplify it. -- Joel