From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3736 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 14:05:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3711 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 14:05:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:05:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HE5dHd006397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:05:39 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3HE5Zp8019777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:05:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:11:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar Subject: Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero Message-ID: <20120417140535.GA5996@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120417124410.GA15356@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D695E.7070002@redhat.com> <20120417131559.GA25248@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D76B7.90709@redhat.com> <20120417140122.GB28916@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D783C.3000501@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F8D783C.3000501@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:03:40 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > You're deeply confused if you think C++ invented getters/setters. I never thought so and I never said so. But C++ is the most easily applicable getters/setters-featuring language to GDB. Jan