From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28811 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2012 14:56:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 28803 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2012 14:56:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:55:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3GEtTUG031561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:55:29 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3GEtHup008664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:55:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Ensure result of make_cleanup is never NULL. Message-ID: <20120416145514.GA18963@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120416144011.GH2852@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120416144011.GH2852@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:40:11 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Just a tiny idea, not really important, but JIC: Could we use an enum > intead of a define so that GDB prints "CLEANUP_FENCEPOST" rather than > a numeric value when we print a cleanup pointer that's the fencepost? It will not work, it is a pointer, not enum. Maybe one could add something to gdb-gdb.py but it also did not work for me. Jan