From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19374 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2012 19:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 19287 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2012 19:36:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:35:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q39JZgWh004803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:35:42 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-23.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.23]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q39JZc1F015382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:35:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:36:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [2/2] RFA: implement 'set print symbol' Message-ID: <20120409193538.GA1650@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <871uo2giob.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120409191420.GA1010@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87fwcc679z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fwcc679z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:21:12 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: > > Jan> Why not to make it default? People will never find such an option. > > It would be fine by me. > I can just zap the option entirely if you think that is ok. I would find the option even useful if you describe it in NEWS as how to retain the backward compatibility. Thanks, Jan