From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5577 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2012 18:33:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 5502 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2012 18:32:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:32:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q33IWekx001150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:32:40 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q33IWbl4002597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:32:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:33:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 5/6] set debug auto-load Message-ID: <20120403183236.GA12817@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120324184029.GF26662@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83398xu7n5.fsf@gnu.org> <20120325191009.GA11132@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83aa34s7jn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83aa34s7jn.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:19:08 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Used: > > For example the list of directories from which it is safe to auto-load files > > (@pxref{auto-load safe-path}) applies to canonicalized filenames which may not > > be too obvious while setting it up. > > OK. Although now I wonder whether this whole sentence could be made > simpler and more clear. What exactly does it want to say? what "may > not be too obvious"? I do not know much. But I guess if you have a mess of symlinks then you may set it as expected and it does not work. It does not have much real world cases, I found I need some general debug mode so instead of just ad-hoc printfs I made it an official feature. Regards, Jan