From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25576 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2012 21:13:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 25561 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2012 21:13:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:12:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q32LCki3022222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:12:46 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q32LChWq009614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:12:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:13:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [doc patch] objfile -> @var{objfile} [Re: [patch#2 3/6] set auto-load local-gdbinit warn-and-*] Message-ID: <20120402211242.GA5980@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120329091258.GD25449@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83hax61rey.fsf@gnu.org> <20120402203055.GA26106@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83ty11dem7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ty11dem7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:10:24 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > But this means existing manual also needs this fix. > > Oops, sorry. I don't know what I was smoking. Of course, > cross-references and nodes do not use @var. Sorry, sorry. But in practice it works OK and the formatting is then unified in all cases, are you sure with this decision? Thanks, Jan