From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 597 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2012 18:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 585 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2012 18:08:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:07:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UI7goP017005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:07:43 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2UHgTLZ020614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:42:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:08:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: suspend: [patch#2 3/6] set auto-load local-gdbinit warn-and-* Message-ID: <20120330174228.GA21673@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120329091258.GD25449@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83obre1u56.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83obre1u56.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01059.txt.bz2 On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:26:45 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Doug Evans > > And are we *really* sure we want to deprecate them? > > Looks like we are. FWIW, I would suggest polling at least some of the > projects that provide .gdbinit as part of their distribution. Even if > there's only one such project (Emacs), its developers should be > polled, IMO, before making this move. I will suspend this patch before the other parts get in, together with its dependent: [patch#2 6/6] Warn (but execute) local .gdbinit by default My primary concern now is the security and this is not related to security. Thanks, Jan