From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 673 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2012 16:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 654 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2012 16:15:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:15:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UGFPPH007228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:25 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UGFMec013389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:15:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow 64-bit enum values Message-ID: <20120330161521.GA19069@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120220132724.GB4753@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <87d397syts.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120229135148.GA32128@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120301224428.GA30631@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120305063542.GA30196@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120305080512.GA12311@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120321100630.GA14496@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120327165950.GA1734@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120328095037.254b22ed@spoyarek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120328095037.254b22ed@spoyarek> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01047.txt.bz2 Hi Siddhesh, On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:20:37 +0200, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > and do arithmetic like this: > > --- > struct_off_t offset; > > return TYPE_LENGTH_VAL(t) + STRUCT_OFF_VAL(offset) > - TYPE_FIELD_BITPOS_VAL(t) > --- FYI I posted first before this method gets generally approved: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2012-03/msg00087.html Thanks, Jan