Re: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST

Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-20T20:24:47Z

On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:42:56 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> Since it's now ok to use int64_t,uint64_t (right?) I wonder if we
> should move away from LONGEST,ULONGEST.
> [I remember a port Cygnus once did where long long was 128 bits. 1/2 :-)]

I agree. Although if for example Siddhesh has the patch already mostly ready
with LONGEST/ULONGEST I do not think it needs to be reworked, do you?

Thanks,
Jan