From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14893 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2012 17:12:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 14882 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2012 17:12:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:12:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59CF1C6280; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KAk-r4e+k1GH; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C361C6278; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2D3C145616; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IA64: EC, the Epilog Count register, is available in ptrace. Message-ID: <20120328171230.GJ2701@adacore.com> References: <4F730961.6030003@redhat.com> <20120328145451.12183.7502.stgit@brno.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120328145451.12183.7502.stgit@brno.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00949.txt.bz2 > Git blame on the kernel's sources shows the define always existed for > at least as long as there's git history (1da177e, 2.6.12-rc2). I > haven't checked further back... > > WDYT? > > 2012-03-28 Pedro Alves > > * ia64-linux-nat.c (u_offsets): Map IA64_EC_REGNUM to PT_AR_EC. Looks reasonable. I kind of doubt it will happen, but if anyone actually comes across a system where it does not exist, we can add some code that defines PT_AR_EC to -1 which would restore the previous behavior... -- Joel