From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11025 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 20:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11014 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2012 20:16:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:16:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2RKGNpt014947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:16:23 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2RKGJ8u031465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:16:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [doc patch] Fix '.debug_gdb_scripts section' node name for info Message-ID: <20120327201618.GA24630@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120327191903.GA23072@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00924.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:11:17 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:19:03 +0200 > > From: Jan Kratochvil > > > > if you try to jump into the link '.debug_gdb_scripts section' or even just > > 'n'/'p' navigate around that node you will find it does not work (at least not > > in info-4.13a-16.fc17.x86_64). > > > > OK this way or should there be some more name vs. node aliases in the > > refeerences? > > This is OK, thanks. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-03/msg00296.html Thanks, Jan