From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-89271-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6237 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 21:45:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 6222 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 21:45:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:45:34 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2QLjUxC005426;	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:45:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2QLjRIJ024024;	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:45:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201203262145.q2QLjRIJ024024@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20120326203151.GA18085@host2.jankratochvil.net> (message from	Jan Kratochvil on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:31:51 +0200)
Subject: Re: ping: [patch 1/2] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 #5
References: <20120309210045.GA30432@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120326190355.GA11001@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201203261953.q2QJrXX4023325@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20120326203151.GA18085@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:31:51 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:53:33 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Sorry Jan, but I've completely lost you.  Can we start this discussion
> > from zero again?
> 
> Not sure what to comment on.
> 
> For [patch 2/2] it started with the problem description at:
> 	[patch] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00795.html
> 
> There were tried various (dead-end) ways to fix it so [patch 2/2] is another
> way how to fix the problem.
> 
> Could you be more specific?

Well, I'd prefer not to have to re-read the entire discussion to
review your diff.  But are you saying that you now do think ON_STACK
is the right way to go and I can simply forget about the history?