From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15281 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 20:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 15273 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 20:32:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:31:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2QKVtjO006396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:31:55 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2QKVpth002457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:31:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:32:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ping: [patch 1/2] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 #5 Message-ID: <20120326203151.GA18085@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120309210045.GA30432@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120326190355.GA11001@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201203261953.q2QJrXX4023325@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201203261953.q2QJrXX4023325@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:53:33 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Sorry Jan, but I've completely lost you. Can we start this discussion > from zero again? Not sure what to comment on. This [patch 1/2] is in fact an unrelated, just it is needed for [patch 2/2]. It has a new testcase so it should be clear what is fixed. For [patch 2/2] it started with the problem description at: [patch] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00795.html There were tried various (dead-end) ways to fix it so [patch 2/2] is another way how to fix the problem. Could you be more specific? Thanks, Jan