From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22743 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 19:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22735 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 19:06:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644E71C6796; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id k3p+1SOnt5co; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3333C1C678B; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38258145616; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: add .dir-locals.el Message-ID: <20120326190625.GA2701@adacore.com> References: <87bonj8aa0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bonj8aa0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00883.txt.bz2 > ChangeLog: > 2012-03-26 Tom Tromey > > * .dir-locals.el: New file. You don't say which directory this is going to be in, and I couldn't determine that from the patch itself, but I don't see how this could be a problem, even for those who are using Emacs and have added some local settings for debugging GDB (they should have selected the same ones). I think it should have a copyright header, though.... -- Joel