From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25651 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2012 19:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 25643 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2012 19:31:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:31:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2PJUlPv009366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:30:47 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2PJUgxe017691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:30:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:31:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: iam ahal Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tromey@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, asmwarrior@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) Message-ID: <20120325193041.GA15171@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <201112061249.47758.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20120315224504.GA24829@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831uop3aen.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2 On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:26:50 +0200, iam ahal wrote: > Quite frankly, I don't know how exactly make records like this: I also do not. Any known versions of GCC do not produce such DW_AT_name+DW_AT_comp_dir. Why you have then created a patch for this specific DW_AT_name+DW_AT_comp_dir case? > <11> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x1e): /home/username/contrib/test/prog.c > <15> DW_AT_comp_dir : (indirect string, offset: 0x0): /home/username/contrib/ > > Jan Kratochvil: > > Where I can see 'dw2-dir-file-name.exp'? I didn't find this file. I have posted it in the testcase patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00583.html Thanks, Jan