From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7516 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2012 18:40:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7331 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2012 18:40:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:39:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2JIdRJF009321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:39:27 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2JIdN8N010191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:39:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:40:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [PATCH] Fix core dump test case failure with a ulimit check in gdb.base/auxv.exp Message-ID: <20120319183923.GA17815@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F63613A.4080501@redhat.com> <20120317073755.GB25580@spoyarek.redhat.com> <20120319094218.GB14010@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120319155729.GC26662@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120319161324.GA25524@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120319163947.GA25836@spoyarek.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120319163947.GA25836@spoyarek.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:39:48 +0100, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > I hope you find this simplified patch sufficient enough. > > That works perfectly, thanks! Checked it in, it is simple enough and it fixes a FAIL: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-03/msg00237.html Thanks, Jan