From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21079 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2012 16:39:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21069 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2012 16:39:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:38:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2JGcf4i013668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:38:41 -0400 Received: from spoyarek.redhat.com (vpn1-5-167.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.167]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2JGcZb3011798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:38:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:39:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix core dump test case failure with a ulimit check in gdb.base/auxv.exp Message-ID: <20120319163947.GA25836@spoyarek.redhat.com> References: <4F63613A.4080501@redhat.com> <20120317073755.GB25580@spoyarek.redhat.com> <20120319094218.GB14010@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120319155729.GC26662@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120319161324.GA25524@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120319161324.GA25524@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:13:24PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:57:31 +0100, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > To check whether setrlimit and sys/resource.h exist, I added an auto-header > > feature to the testsuite configure script > > Sorry but there are IIRC rather plans to remove the testsuite configure script > at all. I also find your solution too heavyweight. > > I hope you find this simplified patch sufficient enough. > That works perfectly, thanks! -- Siddhesh