From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16052 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2012 16:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15974 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2012 16:13:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:13:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2JGD5aI030182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:13:05 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com ([10.3.113.18]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2JGD3Lg026764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:13:04 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2JGD0Dm011859; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:13:00 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q2JGCx5m011858; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:13:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201203191613.q2JGCx5m011858@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Doug Evans CC: tromey@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Doug Evans on Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:09:43 -0700) Subject: Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty References: <87k42lbvco.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201203151833.q2FIXeOs003077__40387.7084645957$1331836457$gmane$org@greed.delorie.com> <87d38dbtal.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201203151848.q2FImnAq004284__18018.6977530413$1331837385$gmane$org@greed.delorie.com> <871uotbscq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2 > But given the pushback for even one new library, I think we're > unnecessarily slowing ourselves down. I'm not opposed to libiberty becoming the kitchen sink, if that's what people want. If it does go that route, my reason for being a libiberty maintainer no longer applies, and others who are more kitchen-sink-minded should take over. The only drawback to adding toplevel libraries is coordinating changes among the toplevel configury.