From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7726 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2012 18:35:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7594 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2012 18:35:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:35:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2IIZ0d9008522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:35:00 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2IIYtDx032288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:34:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:35:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: iam ahal Cc: Tom Tromey , Eli Zaretskii , palves@redhat.com, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, asmwarrior Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) Message-ID: <20120318183454.GA10464@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <83fwgzbrp9.fsf@gnu.org> <201112061249.47758.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20120315224504.GA24829@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00670.txt.bz2 On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:30:17 +0100, iam ahal wrote: > I've included absolute filename option to my patch. Could you check FAILs of that testcase by me? There are probably some GDB bugs but I did not get back to it yet. Thanks, Jan