From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16030 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2012 20:14:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 16015 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2012 20:14:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:14:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2GKEfee010371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:14:41 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2GKEYHL028635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:14:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:14:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Fix watchpoints for multi-inferior #2 Message-ID: <20120316201433.GA18083@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120102164652.GB10231@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F02020F.5090906@gmail.com> <20120120213110.GB424@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F1EAFE6.30202@redhat.com> <20120125152240.GA26914@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F203B6A.7090605@redhat.com> <4F204408.4090607@redhat.com> <4F205F3C.7090406@redhat.com> <4F639E4F.1060803@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F639E4F.1060803@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2 On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:10:55 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Here's what I'm applying. I've added comments inspired on your follow-up patch. OK, thanks. I have not yet replied to that mail but I do not understand the gdbserver/ code well enough to add anything anyway. Thanks, Jan