From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17754 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2012 16:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 17717 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2012 16:57:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:57:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2GGvUFt007953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:57:30 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2GGvQQn015176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:57:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:57:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Stop runaway unwinding on stripped executables Message-ID: <20120316165726.GA2182@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120316120207.GA10006@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201203161350.q2GDouZL019372@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20120316144557.GA22309@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201203161614.q2GGEP8M030953@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201203161614.q2GGEP8M030953@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:14:25 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > It's not obvious to me that -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is the > default everywhere and on all architectures. It is not but it is on all the platforms I am involved with. > Not sure about that. It means more code that has to be maintained. Not sure why I found better to put it in GDB first, I am more inclined now to push the glibc fix and forget about this patch. I will see how it gets accepted for glibc. Thanks, Jan