From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5719 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 19:29:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 5706 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 19:29:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gbenson.demon.co.uk (HELO gbenson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.220.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:29:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:29:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark@klomp.org Subject: Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) Message-ID: <20120315192931.GA11584@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark@klomp.org References: <20120314175451.GA20072@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120315105117.GA3076@redhat.com> <833999wxkt.fsf@gnu.org> <20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com> <831uotwx2d.fsf@gnu.org> <4F623553.5050204@redhat.com> <83zkbhvhhz.fsf@gnu.org> <20120315184026.GA28322@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120315184026.GA28322@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:36:24 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Do not reject obsolete .gdb_index sections with possibly > > inaccurate info. > > > > However, if everyone else is tired of bikeshedding, go ahead with > > whatever you like. > > I would like make clear from the option help that it will have > negative effect on GDB functionality; that it is not just some > performance tuning. So leaving the right wording up to you, just > expressing my original goal. "Innaccurate" is a good word, thanks Eli. I will make the changes and commit the patch tomorrow if nobody has any further objections. Thanks, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/