From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4785 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 15:25:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 4759 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 15:25:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:25:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A85D1C65EF; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:25:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nZIWbNS+DVN2; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:25:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252891C65C6; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:25:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5000D145615; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jan Kratochvil , muller@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ARI patch] Fix gawk-4.0 warning Message-ID: <20120315152450.GN2853@adacore.com> References: <20120314201501.GA1412@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120314211151.GK2853@adacore.com> <4F61C1E1.6040809@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F61C1E1.6040809@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 > > Pierre Muller has been the most active contributor in that area. > > I see him as the de-facto maintainer, or rather "authorized committer". > > These files are not part of the GDB repository, so could be maintained > > a little differently, or we could say they fall under the GMs umbrella, > > or ask Pierre if he wants to be the maintainer.... > > I thought he already was the maintainer? Did we forget to send an > announcement when it happened? I can't find it... That's a good correction. He is, in fact, the Maintainer, since the end of March 2009. It probably flew under the radar because the script isn't in the same repo as GDB, I am not sure anymore. We should document this: Howzabout we start a MAINTAINERS file in the "ss" repo as well? -- Joel