From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24850 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2012 17:55:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 24740 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2012 17:55:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:55:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2EHstGn004574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:54:56 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2EHspq3003416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:54:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:55:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii , Mark Wielaard , gbenson@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) Message-ID: <20120314175451.GA20072@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120314133746.GA5696@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:50:55 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > + --use-old-index-sections\n\ > + Do not reject old (broken) .gdb_index sections.\n\ > +"), stream); > > s/(broken)/(incomplete)/ FYI I may not have the right interpretation of English words but with "incomplete" it may suggest to me that only part of the file will use index and part of the file will be processed by a slower non-indexed method. It should suggest user the GDB functionality will be affected. Thanks, Jan