From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6968 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2012 23:56:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 6957 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2012 23:56:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:56:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBE81C690F; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:56:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id F-Lft9D2Wwkz; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:56:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A424B1C68D8; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:56:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B9A6145615; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:56:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Luis Gustavo Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Make breakpoint condition detection trace conditional on remote_debug. Message-ID: <20120308235620.GZ2853@adacore.com> References: <1331232142-10562-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <4F593DEF.2020100@mentor.com> <20120308233243.GY2853@adacore.com> <4F594363.7070106@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F594363.7070106@mentor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 > You mentioned a problem where a conditional breakpoint no longer > stops where it should when using gdbserver. I'm assuming it is a > regression we didn't catch with GDB's testsuite when testing the > target-side condition patches. > > Is this the case or is it something else? Aaaaah :-). That's: [RFA] ax-gdb: Do not treat enums and bools as integers. http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00287.html The problem is easy to understand. But unfortunately, I am unable to produce a testcase outside of the proprietary code that shows the problem (http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00302.html). But thanks for the offer! -- Joel