From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17675 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2012 22:23:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17665 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2012 22:23:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:22:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA2C1C6B05; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:22:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XFw3WSnjs04D; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:22:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CB91C6B04; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:22:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFBED145615; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:22:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Make breakpoint condition detection trace conditional on remote_debug. Message-ID: <20120308222248.GA11853@adacore.com> References: <1331232142-10562-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <4F58FF59.1030402@redhat.com> <20120308205609.GT2853@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120308205609.GT2853@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 > > > gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * server.c (process_point_options): If a conditional expression > > > is found, only print a message if remote_debug is nonzero. > > > > > > Yes, please. Thanks. > > Thanks, Pedro. Tested on x86_64-linux, and now checked in. Actually, I initially pushed the wrong patch by accident: [RFA] ax-gdb: Do not treat enums and bools as integers. http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00287.html Thanks to Pedro for letting me know. I pushed the correct patch, now. Yeah. I think... http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-03/msg00140.html -- Joel