From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16395 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 21:04:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 16386 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 21:04:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:04:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E180A1C66CF; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:04:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id k7jHiM7Azk2Y; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:04:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77E51C667E; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:04:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41F46145615; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:04:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:04:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: two Ada tests -vs- debug-file-directory Message-ID: <20120305210413.GK2853@adacore.com> References: <87y5revka9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y5revka9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 > I have all the GCC debuginfo installed on this machine, but the > apparently-failing Ada tests are not prepared to see this. [...] > 2012-03-05 Tom Tromey > > * gdb.ada/operator_bp.exp: Clear debug-file-directory. > * gdb.ada/mi_task_arg.exp: Clear debug-file-directory. That would work for me. Do you still have a copy of the failures somewhere? I'd be interested in knowing what they are, to see if it's a weakness in the testcase or a real bug... Thanks! -- Joel