From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28324 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 17:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28311 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 17:22:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:22:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040611C6641; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:22:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5z-xaL0uKIiX; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:22:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C064E1C6640; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:22:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF8EB145615; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:22:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:22:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tristan Gingold , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/ Message-ID: <20120305172220.GI2853@adacore.com> References: <4F54F4CA.4000004@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F54F4CA.4000004@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 > > Should I simply cvs remove/cvs add ? We will loose the cvs log, but for i386-stub.c (the only one I checked), it is not very long. > > > I think git log will understand the rename anyway, so that's fine with me. > I can't speak for others, but my only use of cvs log nowadays is through the > cvs web frontend. I prefer this approach as well, as I'd rather we avoid repository surgery just for these relatively minor files... -- Joel