From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29629 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 16:26:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 29610 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 16:26:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:26:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFBF1C66E3; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:26:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VVqUVlD099-i; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:26:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4371C66A0; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:26:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4143A145615; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:26:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:26:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ia64] [patch] Support recent libunwind-ia64.so.8 (1.0.1+) Message-ID: <20120305162621.GH2853@adacore.com> References: <20120303211815.GA6417@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120303211815.GA6417@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:18:15PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > gdb/ > 2012-03-03 Jan Kratochvil > > * libunwind-frame.c (LIBUNWIND_SO): Change .7 to .8. > [!LIBUNWIND_SO] (LIBUNWIND_SO_7): New #define. > (libunwind_load): New variable so_error, use it for dlerror. Try to > load also LIBUNWIND_SO_7. FWIW, seems reasonable to me. My understanding is that the interfaces are compatible, at least for our purposes... -- Joel