From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29122 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 19:40:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28986 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 19:40:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:40:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25JeOqO021802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:40:24 -0500 Received: from mesquite.lan (ovpn-113-100.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.100]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25JeNqF005013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:40:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:40:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none Message-ID: <20120305124023.719c1562@mesquite.lan> In-Reply-To: <878vjf2i4k.fsf@schwinge.name> References: <87pqdgciho.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120215075413.1313f7fa@mesquite.lan> <20120215165907.33f2e9a6@mesquite.lan> <8739aad9il.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120216182544.36b41a1b@mesquite.lan> <87mx8da3b9.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120220162029.2082b6a1@mesquite.lan> <87wr7c7aop.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120224144657.36bbd09f@mesquite.lan> <87r4xd528y.fsf@schwinge.name> <87d38w4rxr.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120301171847.306829ba@mesquite.lan> <87mx7z2qwc.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120302181810.71233eb9@mesquite.lan> <878vjf2i4k.fsf@schwinge.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:16:11 +0100 Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > enhancements which remove those limits would be welcome. > > Should we file a bug in bugzilla for that? Sure, if you know of some test case which isn't handled by the current code. (It doesn't have to be a part of the current test suite.) Kevin