From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3843 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2012 18:08:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3834 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2012 18:08:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:07:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q23I7h1U006772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:07:43 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q23I7dFJ009003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:07:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:08:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] KFAILs: [commit/Ada] print packed arrays indexed by enumerated type Message-ID: <20120303180738.GA12248@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1330544108-25710-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20120303140213.GA21463@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120303175835.GF2853@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120303175835.GF2853@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:58:35 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Do you agree with these XFAILs? I did not bisect which GCC change it was. > > Also gcc-4.7.0-0.16.fc17.x86_64 still FAILs despite it is 4.7; but that may > > change with later updates, not sure. > > No problem on my end. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-03/msg00077.html > I'll see if I can get the GCC sources and build a recent GCC. > If it's missing something, I'll ask one of our GCC guys if he has > time to look into it. FYI the state it: KFAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120303 (prerelease) KFAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20120303 (prerelease) KFAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20120303 (prerelease) (this means KFAIL for _some_ of the testcases, otherwise PASS) PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120303 (prerelease) PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20120303 (experimental) (this means PASS for _all_ the testcases) Fedora GCC 4.7.0pre is more complicated / FAILing but this is offtopic here IMO, it is a pre-release anyway. Regards, Jan