From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-88487-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27338 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2012 07:01:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 27329 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2012 07:01:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:01:10 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2371AnZ000998	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:01:10 -0500
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q237164R011700	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:01:08 -0500
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:01:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [obv] testsuite: disp-step-syscall.exp: Setup KFAIL for PR server/13796
Message-ID: <20120303070105.GA13581@host2.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2

Hi,

[patch] Fix disp-step-syscall.exp on some i386 targets
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-02/msg00635.html

just fixed a testcase which revealed existing IMO gdbserver Bug, therefore
just KFAILed it.

stepi
Program terminated with signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
The program no longer exists.
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp: vfork: single step over vfork
Child terminated with signal = 0x4 (SIGILL)
GDBserver exiting
print /x $pc
No registers.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp: vfork: get hexadecimal valueof "$pc" (timeout)

->
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13796


Regards,
Jan


http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-03/msg00073.html

--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2012/03/02 20:36:39	1.3115
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2012/03/03 06:58:16	1.3116
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2012-03-03  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+	Setup KFAIL for PR server/13796.
+	* gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp (single step over vfork): Setup KFAIL.
+
 2012-03-02  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
 
 	* gdb.ada/operator_bp: New testcase.
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp	2012/02/29 14:59:41	1.6
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp	2012/03/03 06:58:16	1.7
@@ -118,7 +118,20 @@
     gdb_test_no_output "set displaced-stepping on"
 
     # Check the address of next instruction of syscall.
-    gdb_test "stepi" ".*" "single step over $syscall"
+    if {$syscall == "vfork" && [is_remote target]} {
+	setup_kfail server/13796 "*-*-*"
+    }
+    set test "single step over $syscall"
+    gdb_test_multiple "stepi" $test {
+	-re "Program terminated with signal SIGILL,.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+	    fail $test
+	    return
+	}
+	-re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+	    pass $test
+	}
+    }
+
     set syscall_insn_next_addr_found [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" "0"]
 
     set test "single step over $syscall final pc"