From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2746 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2012 19:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2738 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2012 19:48:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:48:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1SJmgnj024027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:48:42 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1SJmdCU018742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:48:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:35:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR breakpoints/13776 Message-ID: <20120228194838.GA5422@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <878vjmswbr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878vjmswbr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00671.txt.bz2 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:26:48 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I'd appreciate comments on this patch. > I have no idea whether it is the best way to fix the problem. I find it OK although I already made some such mistakes in the past. Thanks, Jan