From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23679 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2012 04:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23094 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2012 04:37:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits= required= tests= Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:18:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1R4IjYh015464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:18:45 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.19]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1R4Ifqx020824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:18:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:55:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Luis Gustavo Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regressions in gdbserver mode #2 [Re: General regressions in gdbserver mode] Message-ID: <20120227041841.GA13256@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F2309F1.1020703@mentor.com> <4F47ABCF.9020305@mentor.com> <20120225142037.GA26330@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F4900CB.8010606@mentor.com> <20120225170610.GA31657@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F49277A.70400@mentor.com> <20120225194022.GA16174@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F493D7D.1030907@mentor.com> <20120226215423.GA9147@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F4AFE94.5090708@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4AFE94.5090708@mentor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:55:00 +0100, Luis Gustavo wrote: > What about the following to fix save-bp.exp? Hopefully the syntax is > correct. > 2012-02-27 Luis Machado > > * gdb.base/save-bp.exp: Account for new condition evaluator output. Yes, I find the patch OK. Thanks, Jan