From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2012 23:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24801 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2012 23:43:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mo11.iij4u.or.jp (HELO mo.iij4u.or.jp) (210.138.174.79) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:43:19 +0000 Received: by mo.iij4u.or.jp (mo11) id q1MNgsx7012603; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:42:54 +0900 Received: from localhost (238.152.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.152.238]) by mbox.iij4u.or.jp (mbox11) id q1MNgrKq010740; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:42:53 +0900 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120223.084253.159796243.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> To: thomas@codesourcery.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 From: Kaz Kojima In-Reply-To: <87wr7e8y60.fsf@schwinge.name> References: <87zkca9azw.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120222093929.7e86fba2@mesquite.lan> <87wr7e8y60.fsf@schwinge.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 Thomas Schwinge wrote: > This is about sh and sh64 GDB sim testing for the whole toolchain. (I > also do have sh4a hardware available, where testing is working fine.) > Kaz, could you please have a look whether this looks basically sane, that > my assumptions and the results I'm getting are about right, etc.? You are right, I think. > Kaz, is my understanding correct, that I simply use sh64-elf as target, > and again the sh-sim board? Should I be setting a specific CPU when > configuring GCC, or any other customization? I used sh64-sim board for sh64-elf. sh64-sim.exp baseboard can be seen in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2008-02/msg00056.html > This means, for sh-elf sim testing, we have a bit too many failures in > GCC and GDB, and some ld test harness issue. For sh64-elf we have a GCC > trunk ICE, some section overlap issue, and even more GDB issues. Yep. About sh64, I had used sh64-linux as my testing target, but unfortunately that real sh64 system stopped working after the earthquake. Regards, kaz