From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 730 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2012 20:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 721 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2012 20:08:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:08:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1LK7eEO027306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:07:41 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1LJNEqp001623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:23:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:18:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tristan Gingold , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: RFA: Try to include libunwind-ia64.h in libunwind-frame.h Message-ID: <20120221192314.GA5658@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120213192652.GA11522@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F396CDC.7020504@redhat.com> <20120214072735.GA21362@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F3A5001.4090500@redhat.com> <20120214143545.GA22678@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F3A7531.6050303@redhat.com> <20120220204351.GA15256@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F42C295.6010905@redhat.com> <20120221052428.GA32408@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F436263.4020002@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F436263.4020002@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:22:43 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > First, I don't understand what do you mean by multi-arch in native mode. "multi-" was written in a meaning of "libunwind support for native build on non-ia64 architecture". > We have already spent more time talking about it than committing the patch > below, which fixes the bug, and doesn't make any multi-arch work any harder. I do not agree with the patch but it is very formal, one can change any code by any number of patches. I can submit then some change on top of it. Such patch would definitely conflict with ours otherwise. Regards, Jan