From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28973 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2012 16:23:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 28963 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2012 16:23:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gbenson.demon.co.uk (HELO gbenson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.220.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:22:32 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFA take 4] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) Message-ID: <20120221162228.GA9393@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Evans , gdb-patches References: <20120213184700.GA31170@redhat.com> <20120214090204.GA2839@redhat.com> <20120215094752.GA2712@redhat.com> <20120216103751.GA3378@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 Doug Evans wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > > Ok, so my plan is to implement an --allow-incomplete-gdb-index > > option that will turn on support for version 4 and 5 indexes. > > [recognizing one tries not to bikeshed except when one thinks it's > important enough ...] > --allow-deprecated-gdb-index ? Sorry Doug, I didn't see this email before I sent the other one yesterday. I didn't mean to ignore you! Would you be ok if I went with Eli's suggestion of --use-old-index-sections ? Thanks, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/