From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17161 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2012 20:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 17153 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2012 20:44:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:44:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1KKhu6U031999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:43:56 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1KKhqfb020723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:43:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:54:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tristan Gingold , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: RFA: Try to include libunwind-ia64.h in libunwind-frame.h Message-ID: <20120220204351.GA15256@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120211140919.GA24043@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F395D17.5070303@redhat.com> <20120213190223.GA8851@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F396251.9020409@redhat.com> <20120213192652.GA11522@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F396CDC.7020504@redhat.com> <20120214072735.GA21362@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F3A5001.4090500@redhat.com> <20120214143545.GA22678@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F3A7531.6050303@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3A7531.6050303@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:52:33 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > I don't understand what are we discussing. The possibility is there, but it > needs work to get there. When the future comes, we'll have to adjust. Right > now, nobody but IA-64 cares. Making the limitation explicit by including > the ia64 header directly doesn't make the needed work more difficult one > single bit. On the contrary. I do not understand what is the goal here now. Therefore either (a) Let's finish multi-arch support for libunwind. or (b) Let's make libunwind support ia64-exclusive. The state is in between I have no clue what is a valid patch anymore. I am for (b). Any other opinions before I (or anyone else) write a patch? Regards, Jan