From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14870 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2012 22:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14762 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2012 22:42:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:42:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CFC1C6B87; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:42:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ShMX1dd-8ytn; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:42:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E501E1C6B7B; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:42:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF539145615; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:42:32 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb.threads/attach-into-signal.exp: cleanup Message-ID: <20120217224232.GG14803@adacore.com> References: <20120217193546.10029.74207.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <20120217193648.10029.26589.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <87pqdd9pjs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pqdd9pjs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 > I think this ought to be a general rule. We need exceptions to it for > some executable-changed cases, but I think in general different tests > should build different executables, because this makes it easier to do > additional checking by hand. Agreed! (FWIW) -- Joel