From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8947 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2012 19:23:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 8939 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2012 19:23:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:23:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1CJNIRu026703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:23:18 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-26.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.26]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1CJNE9Y003482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:23:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:23:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [no-commit-intention] Naive unnamed fields for main_type [Re: [patch] Fix gdb-gdb.py for flds_bnds copy-pastes] Message-ID: <20120212192313.GA25793@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120209092727.GA2664@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120209093119.GA2722@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120209151621.GB3474@adacore.com> <20120209153642.GA12261@host2.jankratochvil.net> <874nuyef9c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120210190102.GA9186@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87y5saa3zs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201202121019.q1CAJoQw025308@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202121019.q1CAJoQw025308@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:19:50 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > On OpenBSD we still have some platforms stuck with GCC 2.95. And does it support unnamed fields? echo 'struct { int a; struct { int b; }; } s;'|gcc -c -x c - -Wall At least gcc-2.96-116.7.2.i386 does. > already includes quite a bit of C99 functionality, but some bits are > missing. So maybe unnamed fields are OK for GDB? Thanks, Jan