From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17020 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2012 13:21:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 17006 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2012 13:21:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:21:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1ADLDv4004920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:21:13 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-26.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.26]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1ADL9N5001707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:21:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:21:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tristan Gingold Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: RFA: Try to include libunwind-ia64.h in libunwind-frame.h Message-ID: <20120210132109.GA16734@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <5D1CD28F-F628-475C-B6D8-5FCBF5290C63@adacore.com> <20120210123032.GA739@host2.jankratochvil.net> <3BD738F7-81EB-4194-9B23-BF6366703B68@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BD738F7-81EB-4194-9B23-BF6366703B68@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:15:38 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > Sorry, but I don't have this particular issue when building on Darwin. Interesting Darwin is not affected. Still your GDB patch seems to be a workaround of a libunwind bug. > Wouldn't be easier to get rid of libunwind, and starting from e.g. > unwind-ia64.c (although they certainly share some amount of code) ? libunwind development is surprisingly active/maintained, it should not require much contributions from GDBers. Thanks, Jan